Saturday, 12 January 2013
Critical Reflection on Professional Practitioner Inquiry
Critical Reflection on Professional
Practitioner Inquiry
I have done a lot of reflection
throughout this module. Mainly
reflecting on my prior experience interning.
Developing the questions ‘is the experience worthwhile?’ ‘did I gain the
necessary experience to help further my career?’. All of my previous work experience was in a
completely contrasting industry – Musical Theatre, therefore I needed the unpaid
internships, for me they were compulsory.
I wanted my awards
title to be reflective of my current practice, and a subject I felt
passionately about. I initially
discussed the idea of further developing the ethical practices
within retail buying, but I dismissed this topic soon after, due to the ethical
issues that would potentially arise (Appendix A).
After further thought
and many discussions with both my advisor and S.I.G groups, I decided on the
following title, reflecting both my knowledge and learning,
"Interning as a platform for career
development".
I am open to all viewpoints on the
topic of internship, so am conscious that being biased will not be an issue. I
am not looking for specific answers to my questions, the more variation the
better, as no 2 internships are the same, and no 2 practitioners share the same
experience. Hopefully these results will
lead me to the truest data outcome possible.
After reading and working through
the tasks in Reader 5, ‘Professional Ethics’ and discussing in sessions, we began
looking in depth at ethical practice, focusing on ethics in a working
environment (Appendix Bi & Bii), what the codes of practice are, and how we
will link these to our inquiry.
I will be interviewing
people and inviting attendees to my focus group from different career paths
including from the world of retail, psychology, performance and HR.
I will not need to
contact any companies in terms of ethical practices, as my ethical practices
will lie alone with how I conduct myself (Appendix D).
Throughout Reader 6, ‘Tools of
Professional Inquiry’, we discussed how to ethically gain the information and
data needed to complete our inquiries.
The tools available to use were focus groups, surveys, interviews and
observation. After discussing each tool in detail uncovering the
positives and negatives with relation to my own inquiry, I dismissed surveys
and observation as not being quite suitable or practical for my inquiry, and piloted
both focus groups and Interviews separately (Appendix C). On reflection, both tools worked perfectly
for my inquiry, and in my opinion, using a combination of tools can ensure the
analysis of data collected is reliable and can produce valid results, which is
inevitably my objective.
I learnt a lot from my pilot’s
including how to improve certain techniques used in holding the focus group
mainly, which I will carry forward to Module 3.
My inquiry required qualitative
data instead of quantitive. My aim is to
un-cover attitudes and feelings towards Internship, using the more sympathetic
tools - pushing my candidates further and helping un-cover the honest views
behind interning.
My candidates will be kept anonymous, and
gain a level of trust and understanding that I would not do anything
detrimental to compromise their careers.
In summary, during this module I discovered
the level of depth of information I could capture from my inquiry. Through many discussions with others, either
in campus sessions, via S.IG.’s or email, I managed to choose the most relevant
methods of tools for my inquiry. Completing
tasks throughout the readers, enabled me to focus on a topic of huge importance
to me resulting in my inquiry title.
References
Bell, J. (2005) Doing Your Research Project (4th ed), Milton Keynes:
Open University Press.
BAPP (Arts), Reader 4, Developing
Lines Of Professional Inquiry, WBS 3630
Appendices
Appendix
A
Sunday, 25 November 2012
4D
Appendix Bi
Tuesday, 6 November 2012
My first campus session – module 2
Appendix Bii
Friday, 16 November 2012
Module 2 –
Reader 5 – Task 5B
Appendix C
Friday, 16 November 2012
Module 2 – 4c
Part B, Questions developed further
Appendix
D
Sunday, 25
November 2012
5D
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)